Case guide

LDS abuse records when a name is missing

Describe the role, place and dates you recall without guessing a name. Ask a lawyer how to seek missing records safely.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202610 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Ask a lawyer about sexual abuse by a person linked to the LDS Church.
  • Explain the place, years and your age when the abuse happened.
  • Describe the person’s role and any reports or responses you remember.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Karen K. Caldwell · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Chair of the panel issuing the April 3, 2025 order

Finding: The panel denied the request to group the listed LDS abuse cases. It said individual reports of abuse and the responses to those reports would be important facts in each case.

Order Denying Transfer, LDS sexual abuse litigation, April 3, 2025 (opens in a new tab) · Apr 3, 2025 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2025

What the LDS grouping order reviewed

Design:
Other study design
Participants:
Listed civil actions and their varied allegations; no enrolled patients.
Finding:
The panel refused the listed grouping request and said individual reports and responses would matter.
Main limitation
A court coordination review does not establish abuse, fault, a clinical diagnosis or current case status.

Read the source: What the LDS grouping order reviewed (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What if I do not know the full name?
Write down the name or role you actually remember. Mark gaps and uncertainty. A civil claim needs its own facts and evidence. [8]
Does a Church role identify the legal defendant?
The LDS order describes different Church relationships. It does not find every person in a role liable. Ask who the proposed claim would name and why. [1]
Should I contact the person to confirm a name?
Do not contact the alleged abuser to investigate. Ask a lawyer how missing facts can be sought safely. A case may involve records and witnesses. [8]
Will names stay private during the inquiry?
Ask who can see the account before you share it. Federal court filings often become public. Specific protection needs its own check. [9]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A policy, role or published allegation does not prove your claim.
  • No personal deadline, firm acceptance, payment or privacy guarantee is given.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

What if I do not know the full name?

Write down the name or role you actually remember. Mark gaps and uncertainty. A civil claim needs its own facts and evidence.

Note the location, approximate period and how you knew the person. If you learned a name later, keep the source of that information. Do not turn a likely match in an online list into a confirmed identification.

Should I contact the person to confirm a name?

Do not contact the alleged abuser to investigate. Ask a lawyer how missing facts can be sought safely. A case may involve records and witnesses.

Keep existing messages and other copies you already have. Do not pressure another survivor to identify someone or give graphic details. Ask the lawyer what an uncertain name means for the next step.

Will names stay private during the inquiry?

Ask who can see the account before you share it. Federal court filings often become public. Specific protection needs its own check.

Do not post another survivor’s name in a public comment or social thread. Ask how a lawyer would protect sensitive names in records and filings. A promise about a first call does not settle later court access.

How should I label a possible name match?

Keep the source beside the possible name and mark it uncertain. Ask the lawyer how that lead can be checked safely.

What should the records-work agreement explain?

Ask who would seek missing names or records and how. Check its costs before approving more work or access to your files.

Scientific evidence for this case

LDS Church Abuse · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · 2023Cross-sectional

Institutional Betrayal and Clergy Sexual Abuse: Impact on Disclosure, Reporting, and Psychological Outcomes

Survivors who experienced institutional betrayal (e.g., Church concealment of abuse, victim-blaming by leaders) had PTSD symptom severity scores 2.3x higher than survivors who did not experience institutional betrayal

LDS Church Abuse · Journal of Trauma and Dissociation · 2022Cross-sectional

Religious Institutional Abuse: Long-Term Psychological Outcomes in Adult Survivors

Clergy abuse survivors showed elevated complex PTSD rates (78%) compared to other sexual abuse survivors (45%)

LDS Church Abuse · Child Abuse & Neglect · 2018Cross-sectional

Mandated Reporter Compliance in Religious Institutions: A National Survey

41% of surveyed religious leaders were unaware of their mandatory reporting obligations in their state

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest