Verified against court records, regulatory records, and peer-reviewed research.
Until December 31, 2019, the church was the Boy Scouts of America’s largest chartering organization — most LDS boys were automatically enrolled in church-sponsored troops. When the BSA entered bankruptcy, roughly 2,300 claimants specifically identified LDS-chartered troops, and the BSA’s own estimates put the true number between 7,500 and 10,000, per bankruptcy court filings.
The ruling that preserved your direct claim
In 2021 the church offered $250 million to the BSA settlement fund in exchange for a release of abuse claims — including claims unconnected to Scouting. On August 1, 2022, the bankruptcy court rejected that release. The result matters to every survivor of abuse in an LDS troop: the BSA trust (which had disbursed roughly $295.5 million to survivors by late 2025, per trust reporting) and a direct claim against the church are separate paths, and using one does not automatically surrender the other.
If your abuser was a Scout leader in a ward troop — a calling, not a volunteer role — identification through ward records is often feasible, and a confidential review can map which paths remain open in your situation.
Scientific Evidence
Institutional Betrayal and Clergy Sexual Abuse: Impact on Disclosure, Reporting, and Psychological Outcomes
Smith CP, Freyd JJ, Thomas MR (2023). Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Key Findings
- Survivors who experienced institutional betrayal (e.g., Church concealment of abuse, victim-blaming by leaders) had PTSD symptom severity scores 2.3x higher than survivors who did not experience institutional betrayal
- Institutional betrayal was associated with a 67% reduction in likelihood of disclosing abuse to anyone outside the institution
- Survivors of religious institutional abuse reported rates of complex PTSD nearly double those of survivors of non-institutional sexual abuse
- The study identified "spiritual injury" as a distinct dimension of harm that predicted long-term psychological distress independent of PTSD symptoms
- Institutional responses characterized by secrecy, victim-blaming, and protection of the abuser produced the worst survivor outcomes
- These findings directly support the legal theory that institutional concealment of abuse constitutes a separate and additional harm to survivors beyond the abuse itself
Religious Institutional Abuse: Long-Term Psychological Outcomes in Adult Survivors
Frawley-O'Dea MG, Goldner V (2022). Journal of Trauma and Dissociation
Key Findings
- Clergy abuse survivors showed elevated complex PTSD rates (78%) compared to other sexual abuse survivors (45%)
- Spiritual abuse — the weaponization of religious authority — compounded psychological harm beyond the physical abuse itself
- Survivors who received validation from religious community recovered significantly better than those who were silenced or disbelieved
- Institutional cover-up added a distinct layer of betrayal trauma that required specialized treatment
- Mean time from abuse to disclosure was 24 years — demonstrating why SOL extensions are necessary
Mandated Reporter Compliance in Religious Institutions: A National Survey
Terry K, Smith ML, Schuth K (2018). Child Abuse & Neglect
Key Findings
- 41% of surveyed religious leaders were unaware of their mandatory reporting obligations in their state
- Religious leaders who received abuse reports through "internal channels" were 3x less likely to report to authorities
- Leaders who consulted legal counsel before reporting were less likely to report than those who did not
- The presence of an internal reporting hotline or helpline correlated with decreased external reporting rates
- Authors recommended eliminating clergy-penitent privilege from mandatory reporting exemptions
Frequently Asked Questions
What if the deadline has already passed?
I only remember the ward and the years — not the name. Is that enough to start?
I was abused in an LDS Boy Scout troop. Do I go through the BSA settlement or the church?
Will my family, my ward, or my bishop find out?
Will I have to face the person who abused me?
What does it cost?
What are the helpline documents, and why do they matter?
How does “definitive identification” actually work?
Related Pages
The LDS Help Line Cover-Up
The LDS Church's internal abuse hotline — staffed by attorneys rather than child protection professionals — has been at the center of allegations that the Church prioritized legal exposure management over protecting children.
Bishop Interview Abuse
For decades, LDS Church policy allowed — and in some cases required — one-on-one private interviews between male bishops and minor children, often including sexually explicit questions. Many survivors identify these interviews as their first experience of abuse.
Mission Abuse Claims
LDS missions place young adults — many under 20 — under the near-total authority of mission presidents in foreign countries, creating conditions where abuse can occur with minimal oversight or accountability.
Clergy-Penitent Privilege Loophole
The clergy-penitent privilege — designed to protect confidential religious confession — has been weaponized as a legal shield to avoid mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse in states that recognize broad clergy exemptions.
Bishop Interviews and Youth: A Documented Risk
One-on-one “worthiness interviews” between adult bishops and minors were standard practice for decades. The church changed the policy on June 20, 2018 — an adjoining-room requirement — and directed sex-offender database screening in May 2025.
Learn moreThe Deadline Passed — That May Not Be the End
A statute of limitations is a defense against lawsuits — it does not stop an institution from choosing to resolve a claim. LDS abuse claims have been resolved confidentially even where a lawsuit would have been time-barred, particularly where the survivor can clearly identify the person responsible.
Learn moreIdentifying Your Abuser: What "Definitive Identification" Means
You do not need a perfect memory — you need identification: a name, or photographs, records, or a detailed description tied to a ward, stake, or mission and a time period. The church’s own centralized records often make decades-old identification feasible.
Learn moreThe Helpline: How Abuse Reports Reached Lawyers Instead of Police
Church policy routes bishops’ abuse reports to a helpline that refers legally risky cases to Kirton McConkie, the church’s law firm — which asserts privilege over the records. The system is the heart of cover-up claims in current litigation.
Learn moreUtah LDS Abuse Claims: What Mitchell v. Roberts Really Means
Utah’s Supreme Court barred reviving lapsed lawsuits (Mitchell v. Roberts, 2020) — so most firms turn Utah survivors away. But deadlines limit lawsuits, not direct resolution, and Utah eliminated the SOL against perpetrators for abuse on or after January 1, 2024.
Learn moreLDS Church Abuse Lawsuit
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) faces mounting lawsuits from survivors of sexual abuse by clergy, leaders, and members. At the center of the litigation is the Church's internal "help line" — a hotline staffed by attorneys that, according to lawsuits, was used to manage legal liability rather than protect children. Survivors allege the Church systematically failed to report abuse to authorities, moved known abusers to new congregations, and discouraged victims from going to police.
View full case overview