Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do

Used paraquat or lived near its use and have Parkinson's disease? Ask for an exposure and claim check.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated 13 sources

This may apply to you if

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • Describe what you know about paraquat use, work and locations.
  • Bring Parkinson diagnosis and care records if available.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

A chemical sprayer and respirator mask resting in a plowed field (photo illustration)
Photo illustration

The short answer

Who can ask about a paraquat claim?
If you have Parkinson's disease and possible paraquat exposure, ask for a record and claim check. Describe what you know without guessing. A study does not decide whether a lawyer will accept your case. [4]
What is happening in the paraquat cases?
June 2026 orders set tasks for some cases. A September order skipped one planned meeting. These orders do not mean all cases are over or that you get paid. [7]
What money could a paraquat claim bring?
No personal payment estimate is supplied here. An order that mentions offers does not say what you would receive. Ask about your own evidence, any actual terms and deductions. [7]
What does a paraquat lawyer cost?
Request the proposed written fee and expense agreement. Ask whether first contact costs anything. Check what you might owe if there is no payment before you sign. [1]

Who qualifies

Do you qualify?

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • Describe what you know about paraquat use, work and locations.
  • Bring Parkinson diagnosis and care records if available.
  • Ask a lawyer which evidence and law apply to your situation.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Srishti Shrestha · Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · First author, Agricultural Health Study Parkinson cohort

Finding: The prospective cohort did not find a statistically significant overall association for reported paraquat use. Exposure and disease measurement limits prevent treating that as proof of no possible effect.

Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort (opens in a new tab) · Sep 10, 2020 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Nancy J. Rosenstengel · United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois · United States district judge signing the cited order

Finding: The June 3, 2026 order selected nineteen optout cases for limited discovery and acknowledged declined offers. It did not announce a universal individual payment.

Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discovery (opens in a new tab) · Jun 3, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, first-author affiliation · Environmental Research · 2020

Pesticide use and incident Parkinson disease in the Agricultural Health Study

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
66,110 people:38,274 applicators and27,836 spouses;491 reported incident doctor-diagnosed Parkinson cases.
Finding:
The overall paraquat-ever-use estimate was HR1.09,95%CI0.84–1.41, not statistically significant.
Main limitation
Prospective observational cohort; exposure and disease largely reported through questionnaires with partial validation. Measurement error and subgroup uncertainty mean the result is not proof of no effect or an individual cause finding. Original main manuscript passages read, not every supplemental table.

Read the source: Pesticide use and incident Parkinson disease in the Agricultural Health Study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

University of California, Los Angeles, first-author affiliation · International Journal of Epidemiology · 2024

Agricultural paraquat dichloride applications and Parkinson disease

Design:
Case-control
Participants:
829 Parkinson patients and824 community controls in three California counties.
Finding:
Several modeled historical agricultural exposure measures and time windows were associated with Parkinson disease; co-exposure adjustments affected estimates.
Main limitation
Address/application models are not measured personal doses; observational case-control design cannot establish individual causation. The500meterexposurewindow is not an eligibility radius. Coauthors Myles Cockburn and Beate Ritz disclose plaintiff-expert consulting against Syngenta. Original main study and disclosures read.

Read the source: Agricultural paraquat dichloride applications and Parkinson disease (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • This page cannot diagnose Parkinson's disease or prove its cause for one person.
  • A modeled500meterstudyarea is not a claim acceptance boundary.
  • An optoutorder or schedule is not a universal payment or filing deadline.

What it costs

Lawyer fee and case expenses
Ask for written fee and expense terms.

Ask about first contact and costs you may owe if the claim loses.

Source: ABA Model Rule 1.5: fees · as of Oct 3, 2026

What happens step by step

  1. Gather the records you have

    Keep records that describe your history and the harm you want checked. Ask the provider about missing health records.

    Source: 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · as of Oct 3, 2026

  2. Ask for a claim and time-limit check

    Give a lawyer your dates and locations. Ask which law and claim apply before choosing a filing date.

    Source: Southern District of New York: time limits · as of Oct 3, 2026

  3. Read the agreement

    Ask about the next step, the firm handling the case, fees, expenses and privacy terms before you agree.

    Source: ABA Model Rule 1.5: fees · as of Oct 3, 2026

Injuries in this case

Scientific evidence

Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do · Movement Disorders · 2023Cross-sectional

Paraquat and Parkinson’s Disease: The Role of Corporate Agnotology

Syngenta’s corporate predecessor ICI identified paraquat neurotoxicity in 1958 and confirmed brain penetration in 1966

Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do · Neurology · 2013Meta-analysis

Exposure to Pesticides or Solvents and Risk of Parkinson Disease (Meta-Analysis)

Paraquat exposure was associated with an overall odds ratio of 1.64 for Parkinson’s disease, confirming a statistically significant increased risk

Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do · Environmental Health Perspectives · 2011Cohort

Rotenone, Paraquat, and Parkinson’s Disease (FAME Study)

People who reported using paraquat had about 2.5 times the odds of Parkinson’s disease (odds ratio 2.5; 95% CI 1.4–4.7)

  1. Apr 14, 2025

    An April 8, 2026 court order says co-lead plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants signed a master settlement agreement for certain paraquat…

  2. Jan 27, 2026

    Syngenta settled the Bill Mertens Philadelphia bellwether on the eve of what would have been the first public paraquat/Parkinson's trial;…

  3. July 2026

    EPA Enforcement Action Against AMVAC Includes $541,110 Penalty

  4. August 2026

    EPA Records Show $541,110 Penalty Against AMVAC

  5. August 2026

    EPA Enforcement Record Shows $541,110 Penalty Against AMVAC

  6. August 2026

    EPA Enforcement Action Against AMVAC Results in Federal Penalty

Who can ask about a paraquat claim?

If you have Parkinson's disease and possible paraquat exposure, ask for a record and claim check. Describe what you know without guessing. A study does not decide whether a lawyer will accept your case.

For a first discussion, prepare work sites, tasks, dates and product names you remember. Say whether you mixed or applied a product, worked in a treated field, or lived nearby. If you do not know which chemical was used, mark that as a question rather than calling every weed killer paraquat.

The studies use different ways to estimate exposure. One followed applicators and spouses; another modeled agricultural use near addresses. Their study groups are not a firm's acceptance rules. Ask what records would support the exposure history relevant to your situation.

Ask your clinician about diagnosis and care. Ask the lawyer about legal cause and applicable law. Do not use a symptom list or a map alone to decide that paraquat caused an illness in you or a family member.

What is happening in the paraquat cases?

June 2026 orders set tasks for some cases. A September order skipped one planned meeting. These orders do not mean all cases are over or that you get paid.

Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel's June 3 order selected nineteen cases from people who had declined offers for limited discovery. It also acknowledged settlement offers that were declined. That is a bounded court record about those claims, not an offer grid for everyone with Parkinson's disease.

The June 10 order dismissed twenty-seven named cases without prejudice over failure to comply with a questionnaire requirement. It did not dismiss the whole federal group or decide the medical cause of every illness. Ask your lawyer whether any order names your case and what response is required.

The September 11 text order canceled a scheduled September 15 conference after progress was reported, while the special master continued work. Do not turn that scheduling change into a claim that all cases settled. Ask for the latest document that actually applies to your filed case or new inquiry.

What money could a paraquat claim bring?

No personal payment estimate is supplied here. An order that mentions offers does not say what you would receive. Ask about your own evidence, any actual terms and deductions.

The June 3 court order records that some offers had been refused. It does not publish the amount for each person or promise that another person will receive an offer. A public description of a settlement process is different from your written agreement.

For a legal discussion, prepare the costs and effects you want checked: care visits, bills, work changes and help with daily tasks. Separate documented expenses from amounts you do not know yet. Ask which losses the governing law allows and what evidence is needed.

If an agreement is offered, ask who it binds, what rights it releases and which fees or expenses come out. Ask whether a quoted amount is before or after deductions. Read the actual terms before making a decision based on another claimant's story.

What does a paraquat lawyer cost?

Request the proposed written fee and expense agreement. Ask whether first contact costs anything. Check what you might owe if there is no payment before you sign.

The ABA model rule says a fee tied to an outcome should explain percentages and expenses. It does not verify a particular firm's price. Ask the lawyer to identify the state rules and the agreement that would govern your claim.

For an exposure claim, ask how the firm would obtain work records, application information and medical expert review. Ask who pays those expenses while the case proceeds. Find out whether costs are taken out before or after the fee and what happens if the claim loses.

Ask whether the first discussion is only an assessment or an offer of representation. Ask who would handle your file and whether any other firm is involved. Keep the written fee terms so later explanations can be checked against the agreement.

Which time limit applies to my claim?

Ask a lawyer to check your claim, places and dates. A court work schedule is not your personal filing deadline. The general court guide cannot calculate the date for you.

The court guide explains that filing limits depend on the claim and law. For your discussion, prepare exposure locations and periods, diagnosis information and any previous filing or agreement. Mark uncertain dates as uncertain rather than treating memory as a verified record.

The June orders set tasks for specified pending cases. Those tasks do not establish a national deadline for a new claim. If you already have a lawyer, ask that lawyer what an order requires in your case and whether a later order changed it.

Ask separately about any proposed settlement deadline and the time allowed to file a claim. Ask what action must be completed, who is responsible and what source sets the date. Do not wait for a website to turn your medical and exposure history into a filing cutoff.

What should I do today about exposure?

Had contact with paraquat? Seek medical help right away. For a claim check, keep your work and care records. Do not handle an old chemical container to prove a claim.

EPA warns that contact with paraquat can be serious and says to seek medical assistance immediately. That acute warning is separate from the disputed long-term Parkinson research. It does not require waiting for a diagnosis or a legal inquiry before seeking care.

For a records list, note employers, fields, addresses, years and product labels you can identify safely from existing files. Ask how to obtain application or work records that may clarify an uncertain history. Do not go back to a work site or handle chemicals just to answer an intake question.

Ask your healthcare provider how to request the diagnosis report and related care records. Federal access rules cover specified health records with exceptions. Keep clinical advice with the care team; this page cannot confirm a diagnosis or alter your treatment plan.

What do the Parkinson studies show?

Two original studies reported different overall results using different exposure methods. One found associations with modeled agricultural use; the other did not find a significant overall link for reported use. Neither proves the cause of your illness.

Kimberly C. Paul and coauthors studied 829 people with Parkinson's disease and 824 controls in three California counties. They modeled past agricultural applications near home and work addresses. Findings varied by exposure measure and time window; other pesticide exposures affected estimates.

Srishti Shrestha and coauthors followed 66,110 applicators and spouses and identified 491 incident cases reported as doctor-diagnosed Parkinson's disease. The overall estimate for ever using paraquat was not statistically significant. That does not prove no possible effect in every setting.

Both studies have limits. Modeled proximity is not a measured personal dose; questionnaire data can misclassify exposure or disease. Paul's paper also discloses that two coauthors consulted as plaintiff experts against Syngenta. Those details belong in judging the evidence rather than calling either study proof for one person.

EPA's November 2025 page describes conflicting Parkinson studies and uncertainty about vapor movement, with further data review planned. Its labeled-use assessment is not a finding that every exposure is harmless. Ask a professional how the latest regulatory record and the original studies relate to your situation.

What happens after I ask for a paraquat check?

Ask who will review your exposure and medical account. Request a list of missing records and a clear next step. Read the privacy, contact and fee terms before agreeing to share detailed information.

Ask the reviewer to distinguish what you directly remember from what a record or model estimates. A study that used a five-hundred-meter area does not create a legal acceptance radius. Ask why a proposed record matters rather than changing your account to match a study design.

If you already filed, give the lawyer the case number and any questionnaire or order you received. The June dismissal order shows that named court requirements matter for pending files. Sending an inquiry to a website is not proof that a court requirement has been met.

Before sending detailed records, ask which firm receives them, how they are stored and shared, and whether you are agreeing to representation. Ask how to correct an error and when to expect a reply. Confirm the terms with the provider rather than inferring them from a research citation.

Questions about paraquat records and claims

These answers cover research, exposure records and the cited orders. They do not decide whether your illness was caused by paraquat or whether a firm takes your claim. Bring individual questions to your clinician and lawyer.

Sources and limits of the record check

The linked studies, EPA page and signed court orders have stated dates and limits. A later order or data review may change the record relevant to you. Ask for the source behind any specific legal or medical advice.

How Paraquat Causes Parkinson’s Disease

Paraquat dichloride triggers a well-characterized cascade of neurotoxic events that selectively destroys dopamine-producing neurons in the brain. The mechanism involves oxidative stress through redox cycling, mitochondrial dysfunction, and the formation of Lewy bodies — the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease. This is not a theoretical risk: the scientific evidence, including the FAME study’s finding of 2.5-fold increased risk, multiple meta-analyses, and decades of mechanistic research, establishes a clear causal pathway from paraquat exposure to Parkinson’s disease.

Redox Cycling and Oxidative Stress

Paraquat undergoes continuous redox cycling inside cells, being repeatedly reduced by NADPH-dependent enzymes and then re-oxidized by molecular oxygen. Each cycle generates superoxide radicals, which are converted to other reactive oxygen species including hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals. This creates a self-sustaining avalanche of oxidative damage that overwhelms the cell’s antioxidant defenses, particularly glutathione and superoxide dismutase. Dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra are especially vulnerable because dopamine metabolism already produces elevated baseline levels of oxidative stress.

Mitochondrial Complex I Inhibition

The oxidative stress generated by paraquat’s redox cycling directly damages mitochondrial complex I, the first and largest enzyme complex in the electron transport chain. Complex I inhibition disrupts cellular energy (ATP) production and creates a feed-forward loop of mitochondrial dysfunction and additional ROS generation. The structural similarity between paraquat and MPP+ (the neurotoxin that caused rapid Parkinsonism in drug users in the 1980s) is significant — both compounds target the same mitochondrial machinery through the same mechanism.

Selective Dopaminergic Neuron Death

Paraquat selectively kills dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. This selectivity arises because dopaminergic neurons are uniquely vulnerable to oxidative stress due to their high metabolic rate, extensive axonal arborization, and the pro-oxidant properties of dopamine itself. Paraquat enters dopaminergic neurons through amino acid and polyamine transport systems, concentrating the toxin precisely where it causes the most damage. The loss of these neurons produces the cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability.

Alpha-Synuclein Aggregation (Lewy Body Formation)

Paraquat promotes the misfolding and aggregation of alpha-synuclein, a neuronal protein that normally plays a role in synaptic vesicle function. Under oxidative stress conditions created by paraquat, alpha-synuclein forms insoluble fibrillar aggregates that accumulate in intracellular inclusions called Lewy bodies. Lewy bodies are the defining pathological feature of Parkinson’s disease, and their presence in paraquat-exposed brains provides direct molecular evidence linking the herbicide to the disease. The alpha-synuclein aggregation pathway is also implicated in the spread of Parkinson’s pathology from the brainstem to higher brain regions over time.

  • Paraquat is acutely lethal to humans — a single teaspoon (10–15 mL) can be fatal, and there is no antidote
  • Exposure occurs through inhalation of spray mist, dermal absorption through skin contact, and ingestion of contaminated food or water
  • Paraquat crosses the blood-brain barrier via amino acid transport systems, allowing direct neurotoxic effects on the brain
  • The 10–20+ year latency period between exposure and Parkinson’s diagnosis means current disease cases reflect exposures from decades past
  • Agricultural workers often lack adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and many were never warned about the neurological risks of paraquat exposure
  • Spray drift can carry paraquat hundreds of meters from application sites, exposing rural residents who never directly handled the chemical
  • The FAME study (Tanner et al., 2011) found a 2.5-fold increased risk of Parkinson’s disease among paraquat users
  • Meta-analysis by Pezzoli and Cereda (2013) confirmed the association with an overall odds ratio of 1.64
  • More than 70 countries have banned paraquat, including the EU (2007), China (2017), Brazil (2020), and Thailand (2019)
  • The mechanism of neurotoxicity is well characterized: redox cycling → oxidative stress → mitochondrial complex I inhibition → dopaminergic neuron death → alpha-synuclein aggregation
  • Internal corporate documents show manufacturer knowledge of neurotoxicity dating to 1958

The paraquat-Parkinson’s causal pathway is supported by convergent evidence from epidemiology, toxicology, mechanistic studies, and corporate documents. Syngenta’s predecessor ICI knew of neurotoxic risks since 1958, confirmed brain penetration in 1966, suppressed the Louise Marks studies showing substantia nigra damage, and implemented a "Scientific Influencing Strategy" to manufacture doubt. This knowledge, combined with the failure to warn users of neurological risks, forms the basis of negligence, strict liability, and failure-to-warn claims in MDL 3004.

Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta of the brain. The disease produces four cardinal motor symptoms: resting tremor (involuntary shaking, typically beginning in one hand), rigidity (stiffness of the limbs and trunk), bradykinesia (slowness of movement and difficulty initiating voluntary movement), and postural instability (impaired balance and coordination). Beyond motor symptoms, Parkinson’s disease causes a range of non-motor symptoms including cognitive decline progressing to dementia in many patients, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, and anosmia (loss of smell). The disease is progressive and currently incurable, with symptoms worsening over time despite treatment.

Resting Tremor

Involuntary rhythmic shaking, typically beginning in one hand ("pill-rolling" tremor) and eventually affecting both sides of the body. The tremor is most prominent at rest and may diminish during voluntary movement. It is often the first noticeable symptom and progressively worsens over time.

Rigidity

Increased resistance to passive movement in the limbs, neck, and trunk. Rigidity causes stiffness, reduced range of motion, and muscle pain. It contributes to the characteristic stooped posture and shuffling gait of advanced Parkinson’s disease.

Bradykinesia

Progressive slowness of movement and difficulty initiating voluntary motor actions. Bradykinesia affects activities of daily living including walking, dressing, eating, and writing. Handwriting becomes progressively smaller (micrographia). Facial expression diminishes ("masked face"). Bradykinesia is the most disabling motor symptom for many patients.

Postural Instability

Impaired balance and coordination that increases the risk of falls. Postural instability typically develops in later stages of the disease and is a leading cause of injury and disability in Parkinson’s patients. Falls frequently result in hip fractures and head injuries.

Cognitive Decline and Dementia

Approximately 50–80% of Parkinson’s patients eventually develop cognitive impairment, and 30–40% progress to Parkinson’s disease dementia. Cognitive symptoms include difficulty with executive function, attention, memory retrieval, and visuospatial processing. Dementia significantly increases the need for full-time care.

Depression and Anxiety

Depression affects approximately 40–50% of Parkinson’s patients and may precede motor symptoms by years. Anxiety affects 30–40% of patients. These neuropsychiatric symptoms result from the same dopaminergic neuron loss that causes motor symptoms and significantly reduce quality of life.

  • Paraquat exposure (2.5x increased risk per FAME study)
  • Occupational pesticide exposure (farming, agricultural work, pesticide application)
  • Rural residential proximity to agricultural pesticide application sites
  • Family history of Parkinson’s disease (genetic predisposition compounded by environmental exposure)
  • Age over 60 (incidence increases sharply with age, though paraquat can cause early-onset cases)
  • Male sex (Parkinson’s disease is approximately 1.5x more common in men)
  • History of head trauma
  • Exposure to other neurotoxic pesticides (rotenone, maneb, dieldrin)
  • Clinical neurological examination: A neurologist evaluates motor function including gait, balance, tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia using standardized assessment scales (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale — UPDRS)
  • Medical history and exposure assessment: Detailed history of symptoms, progression timeline, occupational history, residential history, and any exposure to pesticides, herbicides, or other neurotoxic chemicals
  • Response to levodopa: A positive response to levodopa/carbidopa medication (the gold standard treatment for Parkinson’s) supports the clinical diagnosis, as the drug replaces the dopamine no longer produced by damaged neurons
  • DaTscan imaging: A specialized SPECT scan using ioflupane I-123 that visualizes dopamine transporter density in the striatum, providing objective evidence of dopaminergic neuron loss
  • MRI of the brain: Used primarily to rule out other conditions (stroke, normal pressure hydrocephalus, tumors) that can mimic Parkinson’s symptoms
  • Neuropsychological testing: Assessment of cognitive function, executive function, memory, and mood to evaluate non-motor symptoms and screen for Parkinson’s disease dementia
  • Levodopa/carbidopa (Sinemet) — the gold standard medication that replaces depleted dopamine; most effective treatment for motor symptoms but effectiveness decreases over time and causes motor fluctuations (on-off phenomenon) and dyskinesias after years of use
  • Dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine) — medications that directly stimulate dopamine receptors; used as initial therapy in younger patients or as adjuncts to levodopa
  • MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline, safinamide) — medications that slow dopamine breakdown in the brain; used as early monotherapy or as adjuncts to levodopa
  • Deep brain stimulation (DBS) — surgical implantation of electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus; reserved for patients with advanced disease and motor fluctuations not adequately controlled by medication
  • Physical therapy and exercise — structured exercise programs including resistance training, balance training, and gait rehabilitation; shown to slow symptom progression and improve quality of life
  • Speech therapy and occupational therapy — address voice and swallowing difficulties (hypophonia, dysphagia) and assist with adaptive strategies for daily living activities

Parkinson’s disease is progressive and currently incurable. The rate of progression varies significantly among patients, but the general trajectory is one of increasing motor disability, cognitive decline, and loss of independence over 10 to 20 years. Medication (primarily levodopa) effectively manages motor symptoms for several years, but its effectiveness diminishes over time, and long-term use produces motor complications including on-off fluctuations and involuntary movements (dyskinesias). Deep brain stimulation can provide relief for patients with advanced disease. Parkinson’s disease dementia develops in 30–40% of patients and is associated with significantly reduced survival and quality of life. The disease reduces average life expectancy by 2 to 5 years, with aspiration pneumonia and fall-related injuries as leading causes of death.

  • https://www.michaeljfox.org — Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research
  • https://www.parkinson.org — Parkinson’s Foundation (helpline: 1-800-4PD-INFO)
  • https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/parkinsons-disease — NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • https://www.apdaparkinson.org — American Parkinson Disease Association

Who Is at Risk from Paraquat Exposure?

Paraquat exposure and the resulting risk of Parkinson’s disease depend on the route, intensity, duration, and frequency of contact with the herbicide. Four primary risk profiles have emerged in the litigation, reflecting the various pathways through which individuals come into contact with paraquat.

Licensed Certified Applicators

Direct Occupational — Mixing, Loading, and Spraying

  • Mixing concentrated paraquat with water in spray tanks
  • Loading paraquat into ground rigs, backpack sprayers, or aerial application equipment
  • Applying paraquat to crop fields, orchards, vineyards, and rights-of-way
  • Cleaning and maintaining spray equipment contaminated with paraquat residue
  • Working without adequate respiratory protection or chemical-resistant PPE

Agricultural Workers and Farmworkers

Occupational — Field Work and Crop Handling

  • Working in fields during or shortly after paraquat application
  • Harvesting crops from paraquat-treated fields
  • Entering treated fields before restricted entry intervals expired
  • Handling paraquat-contaminated tools, containers, and equipment
  • Working near paraquat application sites without protective equipment

Farmworker Families (Take-Home Exposure)

Secondary — Contaminated Clothing and Household Contact

  • Laundering paraquat-contaminated work clothing
  • Contact with applicators’ skin, hair, and personal items after fieldwork
  • Living in housing on or adjacent to agricultural operations
  • Children playing in areas where paraquat-contaminated equipment is stored

Rural Community Residents (Spray Drift)

Environmental — Airborne Drift and Groundwater

  • Living within proximity of fields where paraquat is applied by ground rig or aircraft
  • Spending time outdoors during or after nearby paraquat applications
  • Using water from wells near treated agricultural land
  • Attending rural schools adjacent to treated fields

Exposure profiles are general guidelines and do not determine legal eligibility. The strength of a claim depends on the specific exposure circumstances, duration, documentation, the timing of Parkinson’s diagnosis, and applicable state law. A free attorney consultation will evaluate your specific situation.

How Litigation Is Impacting Paraquat Manufacturers

The paraquat Parkinson’s litigation has imposed significant financial, legal, and reputational costs on the companies responsible for manufacturing, distributing, and selling paraquat in the United States. Syngenta, as the primary manufacturer, bears the greatest exposure, but Chevron Phillips Chemical and Growmark face substantial liability as major distributors who marketed paraquat to agricultural users without adequate warnings about neurological risks.

Global Regulatory Bans and Corporate Accountability

Syngenta and its predecessors have faced escalating regulatory action, international bans, and litigation for their role in marketing a herbicide linked to Parkinson’s disease while suppressing evidence of its neurotoxicity.

  • EU banned paraquat in 2007 after reviewing evidence of neurotoxicity and finding unacceptable risk to operators and bystanders
  • Internal "Scientific Influencing Strategy" documents (2003) revealed deliberate efforts to suppress and discredit independent research linking paraquat to Parkinson’s disease
  • Syngenta targeted Dr. Deborah Cory-Slechta to keep her off EPA advisory panels and hired v-Fluence reputation management firm to monitor scientific discourse
  • Dr. Ray Dorsey’s 2023 agnotology paper systematically documented Syngenta’s campaign to manufacture doubt about the paraquat-Parkinson’s connection, drawing parallels to Big Tobacco

A June 3, 2026 MDL order acknowledged that some plaintiffs declined settlement offers.

Government Actions on Paraquat

Paraquat has been the subject of intensive regulatory scrutiny worldwide for decades. While more than 70 countries have banned the herbicide due to its toxicity and link to Parkinson’s disease, the United States remains a notable exception, continuing to allow paraquat use despite overwhelming scientific evidence of neurological harm.

The regulatory landscape around paraquat presents a stark contrast: more than 70 countries have banned the herbicide based on the same scientific evidence that the U.S. EPA has repeatedly declined to act upon. The EU ban (2007), China ban (2017), Brazil ban (2020), and dozens of other national bans establish an international regulatory consensus that paraquat poses unacceptable neurological risks. EPA’s registration review of paraquat is still ongoing.

Paraquat Parkinson’s Filing Deadlines

Every state has a statute of limitations — a legal deadline — for filing a paraquat Parkinson’s lawsuit. Whether that time has passed depends on your facts, so don't rule yourself out. A lawyer can tell you. Because Parkinson’s disease develops 10 to 20 or more years after paraquat exposure, most states apply a "discovery rule" that is critical to understanding your filing window.

The Discovery Rule: When Does the Clock Start?

Parkinson’s disease does not appear immediately after paraquat exposure — it develops over a latency period of 10 to 20 or more years. Most states apply a discovery rule that starts the statute of limitations when you discovered — or reasonably should have discovered — that your Parkinson’s disease was caused by paraquat exposure. For many plaintiffs, this moment came when media coverage of the litigation, a doctor’s opinion linking their diagnosis to pesticide exposure, or information from the MDL proceedings alerted them to the connection. The discovery rule is particularly important in paraquat cases because many plaintiffs were never warned that paraquat could cause neurological disease.

A retired farmer diagnosed with Parkinson’s in 2020 learns from a television advertisement in 2024 that his decades of paraquat use may have caused his disease

In most states, the statute of limitations starts in 2024 when the farmer first learned of the potential causal connection between paraquat and his Parkinson’s — not when he was diagnosed and not when he last used paraquat decades earlier.

A farmworker’s wife diagnosed with Parkinson’s in 2022 discovers through the MDL proceedings that her exposure came from laundering her husband’s paraquat-contaminated clothing for 15 years

The discovery of the take-home exposure pathway — combined with learning that paraquat causes Parkinson’s — triggers the discovery rule. The clock starts when she learned of both the exposure and the causal connection.

A rural Iowa resident diagnosed with early-onset Parkinson’s at age 52 in 2023 is told by his neurologist that pesticide exposure is a likely contributing factor, and he lived adjacent to paraquat-treated cornfields for 30 years

The neurologist’s medical opinion linking the diagnosis to pesticide exposure may serve as the discovery date, starting the statute of limitations clock from that point.

An April 8, 2026 court order says co-lead counsel and defendants signed a master settlement agreement for certain paraquat claims on September 3, 2025, and a June 3, 2026 court order acknowledged that some plaintiffs declined settlement offers. MDL 3004 listed 6,602 pending actions on October 1, 2026. Whether your filing deadline has passed depends on your facts, so don't rule yourself out. A lawyer can tell you.

This table provides general guidance. Actual deadlines depend on your specific circumstances, including when you discovered the connection between your paraquat exposure and your Parkinson’s diagnosis. An attorney can determine your exact deadline based on the facts of your case and the applicable state law.

Questions people ask

Does a paraquat study prove the cause of my Parkinson disease?

No. The original studies have different designs and limits and report different overall results. They do not diagnose you, prove individual cause or decide whether a firm accepts a claim.

Source: Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort · as of Oct 7, 2026

What can I prepare for a paraquat exposure check?

List the product, tasks, work sites, home addresses and dates you know. Mark gaps without guessing. Ask about missing application or care records; this is preparation advice, not an acceptance rule.

Source: HHS: Your Medical Records · as of Oct 7, 2026

Do the June paraquat orders promise me a payment?

No. The June 3, 2026 order mentions declined offers in selected cases, not a universal amount or offer to every person. Ask about any actual terms and deductions in your own claim.

Source: Southern District of Illinois: Paraquat Products Liability Litigation · as of Oct 7, 2026

Is a paraquat court work schedule my filing deadline?

No. A paraquat court work schedule is not your personal filing deadline. A lawyer can check the claim, dates, state law, and any agreement that applies.

Source: Southern District of New York: time limits · as of Oct 7, 2026

What fee terms should I request for a paraquat claim?

Ask for the actual fee and expense agreement, any first-contact charge, record or expert costs and what you might owe after a loss. The ABA model rule does not verify this provider's price.

Source: ABA Model Rule 1.5: Fees · as of Oct 7, 2026

Did the June 10 order dismiss every paraquat case?

No. It dismissed twenty-seven specified cases without prejudice for questionnaire noncompliance. It was not a dismissal of the whole federal group or a finding about the cause of every illness.

Source: Paraquat MDL order, June 10, 2026 · as of Oct 7, 2026

Does EPA's labeled-use review mean paraquat contact is harmless?

No. EPA warns that paraquat contact can be serious and calls for immediate medical assistance. Its page also describes conflicting Parkinson studies and continuing vapor uncertainty; it does not settle your individual cause or claim.

Source: EPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safety · as of Oct 7, 2026

Is five hundred meters a paraquat claim acceptance radius?

No. That was a modeled exposure area in the Paul case-control study. It does not measure every person's dose or create a legal acceptance boundary. Ask what actual exposure records are relevant to you.

Source: Paul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control study · as of Oct 7, 2026

Stay informed

Get free updates about Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do

No phone call required. We will email you when there is a relevant update.

By submitting, you agree to receive email updates about this case. You can unsubscribe anytime. This is not legal advice, and we are not a law firm.

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohortShrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort · study
  5. Paul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control studyPaul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control study · study
  6. EPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safetyEPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safety · regulator
  7. Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discoveryRosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discovery · court
  8. Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5839 specified dismissalsRosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5839 specified dismissals · court
  9. Southern District of Illinois: September11,2026 Paraquat textorderSouthern District of Illinois: September11,2026 Paraquat textorder · court
  10. EPA Enforcement Action Against AMVAC Includes $541,110 Penaltyecho.epa.gov · Jul 31, 2026 · regulator
  11. Syngenta settled the Bill Mertens Philadelphia bellwether on the eve of what would have been the first public paraquat/Parkinson's trial; amount undisclosed. Per the report, Syngenta has settled every trial-ready case before opening statements; a prior multi-plaintiff settlement exceeded $187M; next trial was set for April 2026. Verified via The New Lede.thenewlede.org · Jan 27, 2026
  12. An April 8, 2026 court order says co-lead plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants signed a master settlement agreement for certain paraquat claims on September 3, 2025. The order calls for information about people who declined offers or had not chosen whether to participate. It states no payment amount for any person.thenewlede.org · Apr 14, 2025
  13. Judge Rosenstengel issued the MDL-3004 Daubert orders 'Order Relating to Dr. Wells' and 'Order Relating to Dismissal of Cases' (both dated 2024-04-17 on the S.D. Ill. court's MDL page), excluding plaintiffs' sole causation expert Dr. Martin Wells as unreliable and granting judgment against the first four bellwether cases; the court then ordered selection of a new bellwether pool. Order dates verified on the court's own site; details corroborated by AboutLawsuits (secondary tracker, flagged).ilsd.uscourts.gov · Apr 17, 2024 · court

Checked against 11 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest