Settlement guide

Paraquat Offers: Check the Actual Terms

Have a paraquat offer or payout headline to check? Ask whose case the terms cover and whether they are current.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202613 sources

This may apply to you if

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • Describe what you know about paraquat use, work and locations.
  • Bring Parkinson diagnosis and care records if available.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Srishti Shrestha · Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · First author, Agricultural Health Study Parkinson cohort

Finding: The prospective cohort did not find a statistically significant overall association for reported paraquat use. Exposure and disease measurement limits prevent treating that as proof of no possible effect.

Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort (opens in a new tab) · Sep 10, 2020 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Nancy J. Rosenstengel · United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois · United States district judge signing the cited order

Finding: The June 3, 2026 order selected nineteen optout cases for limited discovery and acknowledged declined offers. It did not announce a universal individual payment.

Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discovery (opens in a new tab) · Jun 3, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, first-author affiliation · Environmental Research · 2020

Pesticide use and incident Parkinson disease in the Agricultural Health Study

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
66,110 people:38,274 applicators and27,836 spouses;491 reported incident doctor-diagnosed Parkinson cases.
Finding:
The overall paraquat-ever-use estimate was HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.84–1.41, not statistically significant.
Main limitation
Prospective observational cohort; exposure and disease largely reported through questionnaires with partial validation. Measurement error and subgroup uncertainty mean the result is not proof of no effect or an individual cause finding.

Read the source: Pesticide use and incident Parkinson disease in the Agricultural Health Study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

University of California, Los Angeles, first-author affiliation · International Journal of Epidemiology · 2024

Agricultural paraquat dichloride applications and Parkinson disease

Design:
Case-control
Participants:
829 Parkinson patients and824 community controls in three California counties.
Finding:
Several modeled historical agricultural exposure measures and time windows were associated with Parkinson disease; co-exposure adjustments affected estimates.
Main limitation
Address/application models are not measured personal doses; observational case-control design cannot establish individual causation. The 500-meter exposure window is not an eligibility radius. Coauthors Myles Cockburn and Beate Ritz disclose plaintiff-expert consulting against Syngenta.

Read the source: Agricultural paraquat dichloride applications and Parkinson disease (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Has a settlement offer been announced for my claim?
The June2026order discusses offers declined by selected claimants. It does not show that every reader has an offer. Ask for your own written terms. [7]
What do we know about personal amounts?
This page does not set your amount. Ask whether a figure is an offer, a total or money after deductions. Keep the actual dated terms. [7]
What factors affect whether an offer applies?
Ask about the claim, exposure and care records. A disease name or study group does not mean you are included. Have the actual terms checked for your case. [5]
What fees and case expenses reduce the amount?
Get the legal fee and expense terms in writing. Ask how deductions work. Check whether any costs remain after a loss. [1]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • No projected range or average payout is supplied.
  • A court task or canceled hearing is not a payment confirmation.
  • No new claim acceptance or personal distribution date is promised.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

Have a paraquat offer or payout headline to check? Ask whose case the terms cover and whether they are current. Review fees, costs and next steps. This page does not estimate your own amount.

Has a settlement offer been announced for my claim?

The June2026order discusses offers declined by selected claimants. It does not show that every reader has an offer. Ask for your own written terms.

The June 3 order selected19 Nachawati cases for limited fact gathering after offers were declined. Its defined group is not every person with possible paraquat exposure. Ask which agreement and case apply rather than interpreting an acknowledged offer as a new public program or an award to everyone.

What do we know about personal amounts?

This page does not set your amount. Ask whether a figure is an offer, a total or money after deductions. Keep the actual dated terms.

The selected Juneorder does not publish each claimant’s offer value or a universal payout grid. An unsupported forecast cannot establish the result for your case. Read the specific offer, release and any later court action with the lawyer before treating another person’s figure as your own recovery.

What factors affect whether an offer applies?

Ask about the claim, exposure and care records. A disease name or study group does not mean you are included. Have the actual terms checked for your case.

The California address-model study and prospective farm cohort have distinct findings and limits. Neither sets settlement eligibility or legal damages. Bring prior claims, releases and case papers; the June10dismissal order shows that specified court tasks can matter without deciding every case’s disease cause.

What fees and case expenses reduce the amount?

Get the legal fee and expense terms in writing. Ask how deductions work. Check whether any costs remain after a loss.

The ABA model fee rule describes written recovery-based terms, percentages and expenses. It is not a quote from the receiving firm or every state’s adopted rule. Ask which work, costs and deductions the actual agreement covers instead of treating an offer headline as the money that reaches you.

When could a payment arrive?

Ask about your own agreement’s steps and conditions. A canceled hearing is not a payment date. This page promises no calendar for money.

The September 11 order canceled a conference about one firm’s cases after reported progress and directed continued work. It does not announce that all cases ended or all checks arrived. Personal timing needs current correspondence and actual agreed terms, not a procedure date copied into a payment forecast.

Should I trust an online average or projected range?

Ask for the actual source and whose case it describes. Do not treat a forecast as your offer. Check the filing rule without waiting for a payout estimate.

The selected orders provide no national amount calculator. A diagnosis, address-model estimate or occupational category also does not set an award. Keep clinical and exposure records and ask a lawyer which personal law, proof and offer apply before relying on an unsourced dollar range or promised distribution cycle.

What happens when I check an offer or new claim?

Bring the offer, release and prior papers if they exist. Ask what the terms cover and what action is next. Confirm representation and written costs.

Covered-record access has exceptions; explain missing facts instead of filling them from an advertisement. Ask whether the firm agreed to act and whether a filing or response is required. A website inquiry does not establish an award, protect every deadline or enroll someone in an unverified payment program.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohortShrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort · study
  5. Paul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control studyPaul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control study · study
  6. EPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safetyEPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safety · regulator
  7. Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discoveryRosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discovery · court
  8. Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5839 specified dismissalsRosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5839 specified dismissals · court
  9. Southern District of Illinois: September11,2026 Paraquat textorderSouthern District of Illinois: September11,2026 Paraquat textorder · court
  10. EPA Enforcement Action Against AMVAC Includes $541,110 Penaltyecho.epa.gov · Jul 31, 2026 · regulator
  11. Syngenta settled the Bill Mertens Philadelphia bellwether on the eve of what would have been the first public paraquat/Parkinson's trial; amount undisclosed. Per the report, Syngenta has settled every trial-ready case before opening statements; a prior multi-plaintiff settlement exceeded $187M; next trial was set for April 2026. Verified via The New Lede.thenewlede.org · Jan 27, 2026
  12. An April 8, 2026 court order says co-lead plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants signed a master settlement agreement for certain paraquat claims on September 3, 2025. The order calls for information about people who declined offers or had not chosen whether to participate. It states no payment amount for any person.thenewlede.org · Apr 14, 2025
  13. Judge Rosenstengel issued the MDL-3004 Daubert orders 'Order Relating to Dr. Wells' and 'Order Relating to Dismissal of Cases' (both dated 2024-04-17 on the S.D. Ill. court's MDL page), excluding plaintiffs' sole causation expert Dr. Martin Wells as unreliable and granting judgment against the first four bellwether cases; the court then ordered selection of a new bellwether pool. Order dates verified on the court's own site; details corroborated by AboutLawsuits (secondary tracker, flagged).ilsd.uscourts.gov · Apr 17, 2024 · court

Checked against 11 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026