Case guide

After a Death: Paraquat, Care and Claim Records

If someone with Parkinson’s died, keep the care and possible paraquat records. Ask a lawyer who may act and which law applies.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202616 sources

This may apply to you if

  • These suggestions help you prepare for a claim check. They are not a firm's acceptance rules.
  • Describe what you know about paraquat use, work and locations.
  • Bring Parkinson diagnosis and care records if available.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Srishti Shrestha · Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · First author, Agricultural Health Study Parkinson cohort

Finding: The prospective cohort did not find a statistically significant overall association for reported paraquat use. Exposure and disease measurement limits prevent treating that as proof of no possible effect.

Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort (opens in a new tab) · Sep 10, 2020 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

Nancy J. Rosenstengel · United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois · United States district judge signing the cited order

Finding: The June 3, 2026 order selected nineteen optout cases for limited discovery and acknowledged declined offers. It did not announce a universal individual payment.

Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discovery (opens in a new tab) · Jun 3, 2026 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, first-author affiliation · Environmental Research · 2020

Pesticide use and incident Parkinson disease in the Agricultural Health Study

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
66,110 people:38,274 applicators and27,836 spouses;491 reported incident doctor-diagnosed Parkinson cases.
Finding:
The overall paraquat-ever-use estimate was HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.84–1.41, not statistically significant.
Main limitation
Prospective observational cohort; exposure and disease largely reported through questionnaires with partial validation. Measurement error and subgroup uncertainty mean the result is not proof of no effect or an individual cause finding.

Read the source: Pesticide use and incident Parkinson disease in the Agricultural Health Study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

University of California, Los Angeles, first-author affiliation · International Journal of Epidemiology · 2024

Agricultural paraquat dichloride applications and Parkinson disease

Design:
Case-control
Participants:
829 Parkinson patients and824 community controls in three California counties.
Finding:
Several modeled historical agricultural exposure measures and time windows were associated with Parkinson disease; co-exposure adjustments affected estimates.
Main limitation
Address/application models are not measured personal doses; observational case-control design cannot establish individual causation. The 500-meter exposure window is not an eligibility radius. Coauthors Myles Cockburn and Beate Ritz disclose plaintiff-expert consulting against Syngenta.

Read the source: Agricultural paraquat dichloride applications and Parkinson disease (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

What can the care records explain after a death?
Keep the diagnosis, course of care and death records you have. Ask the clinician to explain documented findings. Do not assign cause from a pesticide headline. [14]
Who may request the person’s health records?
Ask who has the right to get the files after a death. The provider may need papers that show that right. A family tie alone may not be enough. [15]
Who can bring a claim after the death?
Have a lawyer check the claim, family tie and law. The right to get files differs from the right to sue. This page does not decide who may act. [16]
What does paraquat research establish for a family claim?
Study findings do not decide one person’s exposure or cause. Keep the designs and limits with the result. A legal review needs the actual history. [5]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • Not every relative automatically has authority to act.
  • No death is attributed to paraquat by this page.
  • No universal family award, filing period or program acceptance is promised.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

If someone with Parkinson’s died, keep the care and possible paraquat records. Ask a lawyer who may act and which law applies. A disease name alone does not decide the death’s cause or a family claim.

What can the care records explain after a death?

Keep the diagnosis, course of care and death records you have. Ask the clinician to explain documented findings. Do not assign cause from a pesticide headline.

NIH describes Parkinson’s as a movement disorder with effects that can worsen over time. That general description does not determine a particular death’s cause or prove paraquat responsibility. Keep clinical findings separate from an assumption that every person with the disease died because of the same exposure.

Who may request the person’s health records?

Ask who has the right to get the files after a death. The provider may need papers that show that right. A family tie alone may not be enough.

HHS describes an executor, administrator or another person authorized by law as a deceased person’s representative. Access has conditions and exceptions. Ask which papers the provider needs rather than assuming every relative, helper or potential claimant may receive the full clinical file.

Who can bring a claim after the death?

Have a lawyer check the claim, family tie and law. The right to get files differs from the right to sue. This page does not decide who may act.

The court guide describes claims about harm and who was at fault. It does not give every family a right to money. Ask whether an estate process is needed and whose claim is being checked. A right to get health files does not by itself show who may sue.

What does paraquat research establish for a family claim?

Study findings do not decide one person’s exposure or cause. Keep the designs and limits with the result. A legal review needs the actual history.

The California address study found links, while the farm cohort’s overall result was not clear enough to rule out chance. Their designs and measures have limits. Neither decides an estate’s right to money or one person’s death cause. The June 3 court order concerns selected offers and case tasks, not awards for all families.

What filing dates and costs should be checked promptly?

Ask which claim and filing rule apply after the death. Do not assume every family uses the same clock. Get legal fees and case expenses in writing.

A general deadline explanation supplies no national paraquat-death filing date or automatic extension. Earlier cases, agreements and care dates may matter to the review. Ask about recovery deductions and expenses after a loss instead of assuming that bereavement itself establishes representation or a payment.

What can I prepare for a personal review?

Keep the exposure, health and prior legal papers with dates. Label uncertain details. Confirm who may share the files and what next action is proposed.

Use the proper access process for covered records and explain missing product or work details without guessing. Confirm the receiving firm, permissions and fee terms before sending sensitive material. A request for review is not a filed complaint, acceptance or a family award.

Scientific evidence for this case

Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do · Movement Disorders · 2023Cross-sectional

Paraquat and Parkinson’s Disease: The Role of Corporate Agnotology

Syngenta’s corporate predecessor ICI identified paraquat neurotoxicity in 1958 and confirmed brain penetration in 1966

Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do · Neurology · 2013Meta-analysis

Exposure to Pesticides or Solvents and Risk of Parkinson Disease (Meta-Analysis)

Paraquat exposure was associated with an overall odds ratio of 1.64 for Parkinson’s disease, confirming a statistically significant increased risk

Paraquat claim: what to ask and what to do · Environmental Health Perspectives · 2011Cohort

Rotenone, Paraquat, and Parkinson’s Disease (FAME Study)

People who reported using paraquat had about 2.5 times the odds of Parkinson’s disease (odds ratio 2.5; 95% CI 1.4–4.7)

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Questions about this guide

Who can file a wrongful death claim for a paraquat victim?

Wrongful death claims are typically filed by the surviving spouse, adult children, parents (if the deceased had no spouse or children), or the personal representative of the deceased’s estate. The specific rules vary by state — some states give priority to the surviving spouse, others allow children to file independently, and some require claims to be brought by the estate’s executor or administrator. In many cases, an attorney can help identify the appropriate party to file the claim and assist with any estate administration requirements. The key is that someone with legal standing files the claim within the applicable statute of limitations, which in wrongful death cases often runs from the date of death.

Is there a different deadline for wrongful death claims versus living plaintiff claims?

In many states, yes. Wrongful death statutes of limitations often run from the date of death rather than the date of discovery of the paraquat-Parkinson’s connection. This can provide a longer filing window in some cases, particularly when the deceased died recently. However, the specific rules vary significantly by state, and some states apply the same discovery rule to wrongful death claims as to personal injury claims. Because of this complexity, it is important to consult an attorney after a family member’s death from Parkinson’s disease. The attorney can determine the applicable deadline under your state’s law and ensure the claim is filed in time.

What compensation is available in a paraquat wrongful death claim?

Wrongful death claims in the paraquat litigation seek several categories of compensation. A survival action covers the deceased’s own damages: pain and suffering during the illness, medical expenses incurred before death, and lost earning capacity from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. The wrongful death claim covers the family’s losses: loss of financial support (particularly significant when the deceased was the primary earner), loss of companionship and consortium, loss of parental guidance and care, funeral and burial expenses, and emotional distress of surviving family members. Some states also allow punitive damages in wrongful death cases when the defendant’s conduct was particularly egregious — which the evidence of Syngenta’s deliberate suppression of neurotoxicity research may support.

Sources

  1. ABA Model Rule 1.5: feesABA Model Rule 1.5: fees
  2. Southern District of New York: time limitsSouthern District of New York: time limits · court
  3. 45 CFR 164.524: access to health records45 CFR 164.524: access to health records · regulator
  4. Shrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohortShrestha: pesticides and incident Parkinson disease, original cohort · study
  5. Paul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control studyPaul: agricultural paraquat applications and Parkinson disease, original case-control study · study
  6. EPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safetyEPA: Paraquat Dichloride review and acute safety · regulator
  7. Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discoveryRosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5834 limited discovery · court
  8. Rosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5839 specified dismissalsRosenstengel: Paraquat Doc5839 specified dismissals · court
  9. Southern District of Illinois: September11,2026 Paraquat textorderSouthern District of Illinois: September11,2026 Paraquat textorder · court
  10. EPA Enforcement Action Against AMVAC Includes $541,110 Penaltyecho.epa.gov · Jul 31, 2026 · regulator
  11. Syngenta settled the Bill Mertens Philadelphia bellwether on the eve of what would have been the first public paraquat/Parkinson's trial; amount undisclosed. Per the report, Syngenta has settled every trial-ready case before opening statements; a prior multi-plaintiff settlement exceeded $187M; next trial was set for April 2026. Verified via The New Lede.thenewlede.org · Jan 27, 2026
  12. An April 8, 2026 court order says co-lead plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants signed a master settlement agreement for certain paraquat claims on September 3, 2025. The order calls for information about people who declined offers or had not chosen whether to participate. It states no payment amount for any person.thenewlede.org · Apr 14, 2025
  13. Judge Rosenstengel issued the MDL-3004 Daubert orders 'Order Relating to Dr. Wells' and 'Order Relating to Dismissal of Cases' (both dated 2024-04-17 on the S.D. Ill. court's MDL page), excluding plaintiffs' sole causation expert Dr. Martin Wells as unreliable and granting judgment against the first four bellwether cases; the court then ordered selection of a new bellwether pool. Order dates verified on the court's own site; details corroborated by AboutLawsuits (secondary tracker, flagged).ilsd.uscourts.gov · Apr 17, 2024 · court
  14. NIH MedlinePlus: Parkinson’s Disease
  15. HHS: personal representatives and children’s records
  16. U.S. Courts: civil cases

Checked against 14 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026