Settlement guide

Camp Lejeune settlement offers: check your actual terms

The government announced an option to resolve some claims in 2023. It is not an offer to each person.

See If You Qualify

Free · No obligation · About 2 minutes

Updated Oct 4, 202615 sources

This may apply to you if

  • Identify time at Camp Lejeune between August 1, 1953 and December 31, 1987; the law requires at least 30 days of exposure.
  • Bring any prior Navy claim submission, receipt and denial notice for review.
  • Bring diagnosis and treatment records and ask about your own legal or VA path.

What the public record says

These are cited sources. Their inclusion does not imply that they endorse People’s Justice or reviewed this page.

Frank J. Bove · Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · Lead author of the cancer incidence cohort study

Finding: The study observed higher risks of several cancers in groups at Camp Lejeune compared with Camp Pendleton. Base assignment was a proxy for water exposure, and some risk factors were unmeasured.

Bove et al., Camp Lejeune cancer incidence cohort (opens in a new tab) · Oct 24, 2024 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

U.S. Department of Justice and Department of the Navy · Publishers of Elective Option guidance

Finding: The Elective Option guidance describes a voluntary framework for certain claims. Its existence alone does not give a person a settlement offer or legal right.

DOJ/Navy Elective Option public guidance (opens in a new tab) · Sep 6, 2023 · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The evidence and its limits

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, with collaborating researchers · Environmental Health Perspectives · 2024

Camp Lejeune cancer incidence cohort study

Design:
Cohort
Participants:
Main military comparison: 154,821 at Camp Lejeune and 163,484 at Camp Pendleton. Separate civilian groups: 6,494 and 5,797.
Finding:
Higher risks of several cancer types were observed in some Camp Lejeune groups compared with Camp Pendleton.
Main limitation
Base assignment stood in for water exposure; smoking and alcohol information was unmeasured. Adult family-member cancers were not evaluated. Group associations do not establish the cause of one person’s illness.

Read the source: Camp Lejeune cancer incidence cohort study (opens in a new tab) · Checked Oct 3, 2026

The short answer

Has a settlement option been announced?
Yes. DOJ and the Navy announced the Elective Option on September 6, 2023. It is a voluntary framework for certain claims, not an offer to everyone. [3]
What do we actually know about amounts?
The public guidance includes an official grid. It uses listed injuries and time on base. It is not an average for all claims. [4]
What affects how much a person gets?
First identify the offer and route at issue. The EO has injury, exposure and other rules. A diagnosis alone does not establish an offer. [4]
What comes off the top in fees and costs?
Ask for the fee and expense terms in writing. The EO has stated fee caps. Do not treat those as a net-payment guarantee. [5]

What rules a case out

Not covered by this case

  • A condition list alone does not establish a civil claim or offer.
  • The 2024 administrative deadline is not a personal decision about a timely filed claim.

The process

What happens next

  1. 01

    You answer a few questions

    About two minutes. Nothing is sent until you agree on the last step and press submit.

  2. 02

    A lawyer looks at it

    A lawyer at the firm reads your answers and checks them against the current case criteria.

  3. 03

    The firm decides and gets in touch

    If the firm takes your case, you get the terms in writing to read before you sign. You can always say no.

The government announced an option to resolve some claims in 2023. It is not an offer to each person. Ask your lawyer to review any actual terms for you.

Has a settlement option been announced?

Yes. DOJ and the Navy announced the Elective Option on September 6, 2023. It is a voluntary framework for certain claims, not an offer to everyone.

The public guidance says the framework itself confers no right or settlement offer. Its requirements and your claim’s status matter. Do not assume that a website inquiry starts that process now.

What do we actually know about amounts?

The public guidance includes an official grid. It uses listed injuries and time on base. It is not an average for all claims.

Read the grid in the linked government guidance rather than an estimated payout table. Its injury groupings are not a ranking of how severe every person’s harm is. An actual offer needs its own covered-claim and documentation check.

What affects how much a person gets?

First identify the offer and route at issue. The EO has injury, exposure and other rules. A diagnosis alone does not establish an offer.

The guidance includes onset and latency rules, meaning time between exposure and diagnosis. A different litigation path needs different proof. This page does not predict a value outside the official framework.

What comes off the top in fees and costs?

Ask for the fee and expense terms in writing. The EO has stated fee caps. Do not treat those as a net-payment guarantee.

DOJ also states its position that fee caps apply to all CLJA claims. That government position is not described as a universal final court ruling. Applicable benefits, expenses, liens and tax questions need their own review.

When could money arrive?

Check the offer and required payment papers. The guidance gives timing with conditions. It does not promise when you will be paid.

Acceptance, a completed release and correct payment documents matter under the guidance. The current DOJ page also limits EO reconsideration and added documentation. Do not rely on an older reconsideration instruction without a current check.

Should I trust the numbers I see online?

Use the original grid or your written offer. Check its date and covered route. Total government payouts are not a personal award.

A total for many settled matters cannot show what another claim will pay. A site’s average may mix different illnesses, routes and terms. Ask your own lawyer to explain the source behind any number.

What happens if I check my existing offer?

Ask which conditions and response dates apply to it. Show your lawyer the full notice. Confirm what accepting or declining would change.

Tell the reviewer about prior agreements and any filed court case. No current intake, offer acceptance or callback is guaranteed here. A release is a legal decision to review, not a step this page makes for you.

Find out where you stand.

The review is free and private. Asking for it doesn’t commit you to anything.

Register your interest

Sources

  1. Camp Lejeune Justice Act, Public Law117-168 §804Camp Lejeune Justice Act, Public Law117-168 §804 · regulator
  2. Navy CLJA portal claim supportNavy CLJA portal claim support
  3. DOJ Camp Lejeune Justice Act claimsDOJ Camp Lejeune Justice Act claims · regulator
  4. DOJ/Navy Elective Option public guidanceDOJ/Navy Elective Option public guidance · regulator
  5. DOJ/Navy Elective Option FAQsDOJ/Navy Elective Option FAQs · regulator
  6. VA Camp Lejeune water benefitsVA Camp Lejeune water benefits · regulator
  7. ATSDR Camp Lejeune health questionsATSDR Camp Lejeune health questions · regulator
  8. ATSDR Cancer Incidence Study summaryATSDR Cancer Incidence Study summary · study
  9. Bove et al., Camp Lejeune cancer incidence cohortBove et al., Camp Lejeune cancer incidence cohort · study
  10. EDNC Camp Lejeune court informationEDNC Camp Lejeune court information · court
  11. NARA request military service recordsNARA request military service records · regulator
  12. ABA Model Rule1.5 FeesABA Model Rule1.5 Fees
  13. HHS your medical recordsHHS your medical records · regulator
  14. DOJ approved 649 Elective Option settlement offers totaling $175M over three weeks (avg ~$270k each); cumulative since the program's 2023 launch: 2,531 offers approved, ~$708M, with over $421M paid since Jan 20, 2025. Verified via WCTI-12 (ABC affiliate) local news report dated 2026-03-10.wcti12.com · Mar 10, 2026
  15. Four EDNC district judges ruled CLJA plaintiffs have no right to jury trials against the government, holding Congress 'did not clearly and unequivocally' depart from its practice of not permitting jury trials against the United States; all Camp Lejeune cases proceed as bench trials. No CLJA case had reached trial or verdict as of mid-2026. Verified via Roll Call.rollcall.com · Feb 6, 2024

Checked against 12 primary sources by People's Justice editors · Updated

How we make money

People's Justice research team · Updated Oct 4, 2026